Posts Tagged ‘taj’

“Suburban Capitalist Islam” – ‘Ilm’ is a Product

February 16, 2010  |  Thoughts  |  17 Comments

Delving further into the theories and precepts of modern ‘American Islam’ and its fundamental list of principles and beliefs, we begin to see a list of beliefs concentrating and culminating on ‘ilm’.

3 ) Since Islam is a filter of good and bad, one needs to obtain ‘ilm’ (religious knowledge) in order to learn how to behave.  Studying ‘ilm’  is paramount in Islam, and most ‘ilm’ is in Arabic.

4 )  What is taught by people in classes at seminars and ‘events’ is a translation and summarization of what is considered ‘ilm’.

5 )  Your status is defined by how much of this seminar-event-based ‘ilm’ you know.

6 ) Your source of English-’ilm’ is infinitely better than other peoples source of English-’ilm’.

7 )  If you learn Arabic yourself you will one day know exactly without a doubt that #6 is true.

8 ) ‘Ilm’ can be expensive.

As earlier stated, Suburban Capitalist Islam is inherently an American cultural product.   What most Muslims in the West experience as the Islamic message is actually  American culture filtered through certain Islamic injunctions.  Under this paradigm, Muslims are able to argue day in and day out over details as to which particular filters/knowledge/’ilm’ they should apply in their lives, while ignoring the overarching logical breakdown and inconsistency between their belief system and their actual lifestyle, filled with TV, video games and shopping.

Since it is a fundamental aspect of the ‘modern Muslim ideal’ that life remains ‘Islamic’ as long as one abstains from certain aspects of Western society (drinking, gambling, clubbing), there is a psychological gap that needs to be filled.   What are these cultural concepts replaced with?  What are the youth to do with themselves while they are struggling in being ardent abstainers from these aspects of Western society?  Surely,  Islam must provide some alternative?

Largely this gap has been filled with the pursuit of ‘knowledge’.   The message has been that through knowledge you are empowered to controlling your own Islamic future.  While knowledge has been important to Muslims since the time of the Holy Prophet (S), it is only now that we see studying being associated so directly with piety and spiritual progress.   ‘Knowledge’ has been set up as this idealized form of certainty and conviction. The more knowledge you get/purchase/sit in, the more everything about Islam makes sense, the more easier it becomes to justify the abstaining from the few ‘bad’ things surrounding us and also rationalizing our largely Western lifestyle as being halaal. And doesn’t everyone want self-justification and doesn’t everyone desire for it all to make sense?

If one notices, every one of the points that are held by Suburban Capitalist Muslims regarding knowledge are relating to the self. Self-esteem, self-certainty, self-motivation. On the other hand, historically, knowledge such as this was thrust onto people by their parents, curriculum, or just osmosis from the culture which surrounded them. There used to be very little ‘self’ to think about when it came to learning *facts* about the religion. This allowed the ego to be removed from the equation when it came to applying such facts.

The consequence? People were as proud of their ‘tajweed’ as today’s college graduates are of their basic pronunciation of English. In other words, it was hardly given a second thought, it was just done.

In fact, the entire realm of knowledge that institutes sell today was largely that which was taught to children. From Tajweed, to the Arabic language, the sunnahs of wudu, only a few really sincere people were studying these subjects well into adulthood in times of Islamic Empire, and if they did so, they were studying intricate details and they did it under guidance and permission of high teachers. But now the masses are doing so, through their own decisions, with a variety of levels of sincerity and ego.

American Muslims, proud in their knowledge, seem to actually be stamping ‘infantile’ on our foreheads.

Most of these ilm-sessions are set up as the Islamic equivalent to very secular self-help seminars. This cultural stand-in has allowed for competing institutes and community programs to emerge, each giving their own message of specific information-based knowledge. And it should be carefully noted that what is being peddled is information-based knowledge versus knowledge of the self or other forms of tacit knowledge which was how much of Islam was implemented in Muslim lifestyles.

It is also interesting to note that although they technically compete on the ‘message’ they deliver (with some specific differences on where they place their feet in ritual prayer or on what type of functions they allow in their Masjids), the lifestyle the people reach under varying programs is quite similar.

A primary consequence of this Western approach towards Islam is the productization of ‘Ilm’, religious knowledge.  What does Western society bring if not the concept of marketing?  Catchy slogans, professional videos ads, hype-machines and superstar personalities have been built up to bring ‘Islamic knowledge’ into our lives.  No one could deny, if given the opportunity , ‘American Muslim Institutes’ would be clamoring for some sort of witty ad selling their wares during Superbowl commercials.

Frankly, if given the opportunity, they would want their own team and hijab-laden cheerleaders.

In this way ‘modern ilm’ has begun to have more in common with Doritos than the sacred, sober and ecstatic people that claimed it a hundred years ago. Since we are customers of ‘ilm’, it needs to be made appealing and worthwhile to us. We are the consumer so we dictate what we want to hear. And therefore we are largely changing the messages to suit what meets our needs. Controlling student egos is hard to do when they are paying the bills and the goal is trying to fill up the hall as much as possible.

Heavenly Blessings of Muharram – Sheikh Maulana Nazim Adil al-Hakkani

December 17, 2009  |  Thoughts  |  No Comments

Muharram enters tonight, inshaAllah we are asking to be good ones this year and make it a year which helps us improve in sincerity and faith. Sheykh Maulana Nazim Adil al-Hakkani delivered the following sohbet in 1999 on the 10th of Muharram.

BismillahirRahmanirRahim… It is one of holiest months, Muharram, and tonight is the 1oth, one of holiest nights in Islam… Tomorrow is the 1oth of Muharram, the Ashura-Day. It has a very special situation in the Islamic calendar, and also in the calendar of world-wide historical events, because on this day Allah Almighty just granted to His beloved servants from His endless Mercy Oceans, and His endless Power Oceans, to be victorious…

It was on this day,

* that the Ark of Prophet Nuh a.s. landed on the peak of that mountain and the flood just finished,
* Prophet Ibrahim (AS) was saved from the fire of Nimrod,
* Prophet Musa (AS) passed through the Red Sea and was saved from Pharaoh,
* Prophet Yunus ibn Al-Yasa’a (AS) was saved from the stomach of the whale,
* Prophet Suleiman (AS) , King Suleiman, was granted the kingdom over all Mankind and Jinn,
* Prophet Eyub (AS) became healthy, and more wealthy than before,
* and the Prophet Jesus Christ, Isa (AS) , was taken up to the Heavens…
* And Sayidina Muhammad (SWS). was granted much honour and an opening of the seven Heavens for himself and for his whole nation, and he was saved from his tribe, the Quraish…

And every time that Muslims fell into difficulties, Divine Help and Support just reached them through this holy month, and particularly on a day like tomorrow, on the 1oth of Muharram… Very important…

I was expecting Sayidina Mehdi a.s. to come this year, but yet some signs have not been completed… and I hope, that he may be with us next Muharram, after the year 2ooo. The 3rd millennium should be for Mehdi (AS) ….

So many Heavenly Blessings reached to believers on the 1oth of Muharram, and it is good luck to reach to Muharram 1999. And I hope that it is going to be granted for Sayidina Mehdi (AS) to appear… Tonight, much more power should be granted, perhaps the authority for the whole world… and his sword, now, is taken out a little bit. Tonight it is going to appear…

And, as we said before, one month ago in Dhul Hijjr on the night of Arafat, a change began. There is a new Tajalli, a Divine Appearance, a new power that will continue now without stopping. And miraculous powers from tonight are beginning to come into action step by step, so that when technology is going to finish and vanish, another kind of power is going to be ready for use…

Try to be with Allah and you are going to be victorious. Try to take yourself, step by step, away from the hands of Shaitan and devils. Try to use less of every kind of instrument which Shaitan and his soldiers helped to invent, because everything that is working with electricity is going to stop, and another source of power is beginning to act…

Now, for a few months only, all nations are going to carry very heavy burdens… When that finishes, there will be a new opening for the whole world. No need at that time for electricity, cars, ships, factories…no. Your light, Nur-ul-Iman, the light of your faith, is going to surround you. Your body is shining, so that even in the darkness of the night you may go…

Therefore I am happy and thankful to Allah, that we have reached to this night, and we are asking humbly for our names to be written with Mehdi (AS) . We are not happy with the situation in the world, East and West, because every system, all living systems on earth now, are against the Divine Rules and Laws.

We are happy and proud enough that Allah Almighty makes us happy with Him, with His Awliya, with Sahibu-Zaman Sayidina Mehdi a.s.- not to run after that shaitanic, dirty life… Shaitanic life is the dirtiest. Run away from the dirty life. If not, you may sink in those dirty waters, dirty situations, and you can’t save yourself. Ask for cleanliness and try to be clean, so that you should be clean in the last moment of your life… Fatiha.

01.04.1999

Imam Rabbani (ks) on the Dichotomy Within Ulema and Within Shariah

February 9, 2009  |  Thoughts  |  4 Comments

What are Sirhindi’s views regarding the guardians of the sharia, the ulama ?

The classification of the ulama, offered by Sirhindi faithfully reflects his views of the sharia as described above. The form of the shariah, which according to Sirhindi is contained in the unequivocal verses of the Quran (muhkamat), is the domain of the superficial ulama (ulama-i zawahir). They are captivated by the form, deny the existence of any essence in it, and are guided solely by books on fiqh, such as the Hidayah (of al-Marghinani and Bazdawi). The essence of the sharia , on the other hand, is dealt with by the profound ulama (ulama-i rasikhan). It is found in the ambiguous verses of the Quran (mutashabihat), which are the kernel and heart of the Book. The unequivocal verses, though called ummahat-i kitab, are nothing but a means t o reach the substance (nataij) contained in the ambiguous ones. The profound ulama understand the dual nature of the shariah, insist on attaining both its form and essence, but concede that the form is sufficient for the person to be a Muslim…

We may say in conclusion, that in his discussion of the Shariah, Sirhindi clearly values its inner, ‘essential’ aspects above it outward and formal ones. This preference results in his according the highest status to the ambiguous verses of the Quran in which the essence is thought to be contained. Sirhindi maintains this view despite the fact, according to the Quran itself, only ‘those in whose hearts there is a deviation follow the ambiguous [verses] desiring dissension [Surah 3:7]. At the same time he maintains that the outward form of the shariah cannot be dispensed with, since the form can never be separated from the essence, and no one can reach the essence while disregarding the form. The concept of shariah is thus fully incorporated into the Sufi world-view. The characteristic Sufi dichotomy of form and essence is thoroughly applied to it. Those who compliance with the shariah is merely formal are rather condescendingly accepted into the Muslim community; their inferiority to those who reach the essence is, however, made abundantly clear.
ref: Friedmann (2000). Sheykh Ahmad Sirhindi, An Outline of His Thought and a Study of His Image in the Eyes of Posterity. pub: Oxford University Press (India)

Imam Rabbani (ks) work, where he distinguishes and emphasizes the distinction between the ulama rasikhin and ulama zahir:

Istidlal means to infer the existence of the doer of the work by seeing the work, that is, to know the existence of the Creator by seeing creatures. The ‘ulama-i rasikhin and the ‘ulama-i zahir always perform istidlal and say that creatures have been communicating [the existence of] the Creator. Those savants who, as stated in a hadith, are prophets’ inheritors are called ‘ulama-i rasikhin. Not all the Islamic scholars are so. Those savants who are not rasikh understand the existence of the Creator by knowing the existence of creatures. They say that the existence of the work communicates existence of the doer. Thus, they believe in the existence of the doer. But the ‘ulama’-i rasikhin have passed beyond all the high grades of Wilayat, that is, of being Awliya, and have reached the grade of da’wat (call, invitation), which is peculiar to prophets. After the happening of tajallis and mushahadas in them, they, too, deduce the doer from the work. And through this way they believe the real doer, that is, have iman in the existence of Allahu ta’ala. After reaching the end, they realize that everything which they have found out through mushahada and tajalli is not the real being but one of the shades of the appearances of the real being. “It cannot be believed as the real being. One cannot have iman in the real being without istidlal,” they say. By doing istidlal, they go on searching for the real being without the shades coming between. Because they love the real being only and because they will sacrifice everything else for the real being, they attain to the real being through such istidlal. As it is stated in the hadith, “A person will be together with whom he loves,” they attain to the real being, who actually exists beyond the tajallis and zuhurs, which are mixed with shades. Being pulled with the rope of love, these great people reach the true origin in person while the savants of zahir reach there in knowledge only.

-THIRD VOLUME, 50th LETTER

What the savants obtain of the din and their following Rasulullah is first their correcting their belief. Next comes their learning the teachings of the Shariat and practicing what they have learned. And what the men of tasawwuf obtain is hals, wajds, pieces of the knowledge of tasawwuf and marifats, together with those that are attained by the savants. And as for what the ‘Ulama-i rasikhin obtain of the din who have been blessed with the glad tidings that they are prophets’ inheritors, along with the fact that they have been blessed with the lot of obtaining all of what the savants of the din and the men of tasawwuf have obtained, they have been blessed with many a piece of secret and subtle knowledge. These pieces of secret and subtle knowledge are indicated by the concealed and covered ayats in the Qur’an, which are called mutashabihat. They have been explained by means of tawil. It is these superiors with rasikh (perfect) knowledge who adapt themselves to Rasulullah fully. These only are the inheritors of Rasulullah. Since they adapt themselves to Rasulullah precisely, and being prophets’ inheritors, they get a share from the blessings bestowed upon prophets. They, too, are made to hear secret knowledge peculiar to those great people. They, therefore, have been honored with the glad tidings: “The savants of my Ummat are like the Prophets of the sons of Israil.”
-SECOND VOLUME, 13th LETTER

Charging for Teaching Quran, Islam, Islamic Texts

December 22, 2008  |  Naqshbandi, Thoughts  |  32 Comments

Excerpted from Mukhtasar al-Quduri, a highly revered manual of Hanafi fiqh -

In Sunan Ibn Majah and elsewhere is the account of a Sahabi who was teaching writing and Qur’an to a man of the people of the Suffah. Later on, the man gave Mu`adh a bow. Mu`adh thought that there is nothing wrong in taking it, and besides, he will use it for fighting in the path of Allah, but he was still uncertain so he thought to ask the Prophet (may Allah bless him and grant him peace). The Prophet told him that “if you want it (the bow) to be girdled around your neck with fire on the Day of Resurrection, then take it.”

Based on this hadith, the authentic view of the Hanafi school is that it is prohibited to take money for teaching of Qur’an. This is the more precautionary view, and is in keeping with the apparent sense of the hadith. The Shafi`is, however, reasoned that the reason for the prohibition issued to Mu`adh here was that they had not fixed any price for the teaching, and that Mu`adh had therefore been teaching only for the sake of reward in the Hereafter, such that if he were to take a material payment, this would reduce or annul his reward. So, they said there is no harm in taking payment if the price was arranged beforehand. They also drew support from the hadith where a group of Companions took a payment of food for ruqyah (curing someone by reciting verses of the Qur’an). The Hanafis respond that this hadith is an evidence for the permissibility of taking payment for ruqyah, but not for teaching the Qur’an.

The hadith does not apply to selling of Islamic books and other materials; it is specifically about _teaching_. Even selling the Qur’an (muSHaf) is not Haram, (except according to a view of Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal), but it is makrooh. Although, the salaf used to shy away from accepting money for books and the like also, and this is undoubtedly more precautionary, so as to reserve all reward for the Hereafter. Yet, if someone is making a living by selling books, then there is no harm in charging a profit, w’Allahu a`lam.

The issue of teachers and schools raises another point. As I have mentioned, the authentic view of the madhhab is that taking a fee for teaching Qur’an is Haram. However, later on when Islam became weaker, and the state no longer took the same care of the religion and its people, such that the `ulama and teachers of the Qur’an were no longer provided for by the state, these people came into dire circumstances. They had no source of income, and no education or training (other than religious sciences) which they could use to earn a living. It was quite literally a matter of life and death for them. Under these situations, fatwa was given in the madhhab on the permissibility of taking payment for teaching Qur’an, since necessity dictates exceptions and makes the prohibited temporarily permissible. Ibn `Abidin has mentioned this in sharH `uqood rasm al-muftee.

It should be note, however, that this was a specific fatwa for a specific situation, and that the authentic view of the madhhab remains one of prohibition of accepting payment. So, if a person is in such dire circumstances, with no other way out, he could take by this fatwa then and accept some payment. If no such mitigating circumstances exist, it remains prohibited. w’Allahu a`lam.

The reality is today it is possible to live a mediocre lifestyle with a job that requires very little training.

Are we in the life or death situation today that has made charging for ‘Islamic knowledge’ permissible?  Or, do we really believe it is a life or death situation for our scholars to be able to afford macbook pro’s?

While the above excerpt mentions the two categories of teaching Quran and charging for the text, the reality is when teaching Islam *you are teaching Quran*. What did ‘teaching Quran’ mean in a society where everyone spoke Arabic?  It meant understanding, developing of knowledge based on the Quran and its lessons. This prohibition clearly applied to the entire field of Islamic study, much less the very explicit study of tajweed and qirat.

Later jurists have extended the permission (of payment) to similar duties like leading the prayer (imamah), calling for prayers (adhan), teaching Hadith and Fiqh, etc., for they are related to the teaching of the Holy Qur’an, and survival of Islam equally depends on them.”

[Mufti Muhammad Shafi, Ma'ariful Qur'an, Vol. 1, p191]

In the above excerpt, it is interesting to note how the wording of the exception is to ‘accept some payment’ vs demand some payment.   With expensive books and classes, Muslims in the pursuit of ‘Islamic knowledge’ have created a subculture that excludes the poor and the unread.  Some Sheykhs of the ‘spiritual sciences’ charge even for their sohbet.  Now we even have major islamic ‘conferences’ with “pay-per-view“.

Why aren’t all these books and tapes available online for free? Empire building.

The new industry of disseminating ‘Islamic knowledge’ or, in modern days called ‘Sacred knowledge’, has reached a new peak.  Any and all stigma related to collecting of personal money under the name of Islam has been lost.  Instead of doing it quietly, with discretion, it is now brazen and up-front.  What is the wisdom in the Hanafi position above, which ruled over Muslims for centuries? A personal examination will demonstrate quite a few lessons.

It is reported by Jabir that the Prophet said: The flesh and body that is raised on unlawful sustenance shall not enter Paradise. Hell is more deserving to the flesh that grows on one’s body out of unlawful sustenance. (Ahmad).

Sultan Selim I – Egyptian Campaign and Control of Makkah & Madina

December 17, 2008  |  Ottoman  |  No Comments

The historian Sadeddin Efendi recounts that Sultan Selim I did not sleep most nights, in his book Taj al Tawarikh [The Crown of Annals]. The ruler would read and discuss scholarly subjects with his courtier Hasan Can, Sadeddin Efendi’s father. One morning, after a night when Can had been unable to stay awake and attend the sultan, Selim asked him: “What did you dream?” Hasan Can was confused at first, but he eventually realized that the dream had been seen by another Hasan – Hasan Aga, the doorkeeper. In the dream, a group of Arabs with glowing faces arrived at the palace door. Four resplendent figures stood closest to the door, each armed and with a flag in his hands. The one holding the sultan’s white flag knocked on the door, and when Hasan Aga opened it, the standard-bearer said: “These are the companions of the Messenger. He sends his greetings and says, ‘Tell him to rise and come. The care of the Haramayn [ the holy cities of Makka and MAdina ] has been bestowed upon him.’ This is Abu Bakr al-Siddiq, this is Umar al-Faruq, and this is Uthman Zinnurayn. I am Ali ibn Abu Talib. Give my greetings to Selim Khan.”

When the sultan heard these words, his face reddened and he began to weep. Turning to Hasan Can, he said: “Didn’t I tell you that I would not act without an order. My ancestors were blessed with saintly wisdom – yet, I do not resemble them.”

Following this event, Selim launched a campaign against the Mamluk sultanate. Egypt and the Hijaz soon came under Ottoman control, and Selim’s authority over the new territory was officially proclaimed on February 20, 1517.