<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Caliphal Deputization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yursil.com/blog/2009/07/caliphal-deputization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yursil.com/blog/2009/07/caliphal-deputization/</link>
	<description>islam, muslims, history, excerpts, life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 04:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahya Birt</title>
		<link>http://www.yursil.com/blog/2009/07/caliphal-deputization/#comment-39109</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahya Birt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 12:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yursil.com/blog/?p=2134#comment-39109</guid>
		<description>As-salamu alaykum,

Please see this later article that I wrote in some detail about this issue:

An Enquiry into the status of the Sheikh-ul-Islam of the British Isles

http://www.yahyabirt.com/?p=138

I was previously in contact with Sheikh Dawud Rosser-Owen about what documentary evidence there was for Queen Victoria having assented to this arrangement. To my knowledge no-one researching this subject has been able to find or produce any. The evidence, such as it is, was that the Sheikh-ul-Islam of the British Isles was an honorary position and not an official one. The details are in the article.

Wa s-salam, Yahya</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As-salamu alaykum,</p>
<p>Please see this later article that I wrote in some detail about this issue:</p>
<p>An Enquiry into the status of the Sheikh-ul-Islam of the British Isles</p>
<p><a href="http://www.yahyabirt.com/?p=138" rel="nofollow">http://www.yahyabirt.com/?p=138</a></p>
<p>I was previously in contact with Sheikh Dawud Rosser-Owen about what documentary evidence there was for Queen Victoria having assented to this arrangement. To my knowledge no-one researching this subject has been able to find or produce any. The evidence, such as it is, was that the Sheikh-ul-Islam of the British Isles was an honorary position and not an official one. The details are in the article.</p>
<p>Wa s-salam, Yahya</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Carty</title>
		<link>http://www.yursil.com/blog/2009/07/caliphal-deputization/#comment-39104</link>
		<dc:creator>George Carty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yursil.com/blog/?p=2134#comment-39104</guid>
		<description>During the &quot;Great Game&quot; era, the British and Ottoman Empires were allied against Tsarist Russia (in the case of the British due to concern about Russian ambitions directed at India).  Remember the Crimean War?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the &#8220;Great Game&#8221; era, the British and Ottoman Empires were allied against Tsarist Russia (in the case of the British due to concern about Russian ambitions directed at India).  Remember the Crimean War?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yursil</title>
		<link>http://www.yursil.com/blog/2009/07/caliphal-deputization/#comment-39097</link>
		<dc:creator>yursil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yursil.com/blog/?p=2134#comment-39097</guid>
		<description>BismillahirRahmanirRahim
Salamu&#039;alaykum,

No, that is not right, relationships between the monarchs of the countries were fine and only strained and led to the WWI result only after Churchill seized British-made warships the Ottomans payed for.    One can imagine the tensions with America and Pakistan with the F16s.  These and other issues were carried by the atheistic Young Turk party which encouraged war.

http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-fornv/uk/uksh-a/aginct14.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BismillahirRahmanirRahim<br />
Salamu&#8217;alaykum,</p>
<p>No, that is not right, relationships between the monarchs of the countries were fine and only strained and led to the WWI result only after Churchill seized British-made warships the Ottomans payed for.    One can imagine the tensions with America and Pakistan with the F16s.  These and other issues were carried by the atheistic Young Turk party which encouraged war.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-fornv/uk/uksh-a/aginct14.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/sh-fornv/uk/uksh-a/aginct14.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PakistaniMD</title>
		<link>http://www.yursil.com/blog/2009/07/caliphal-deputization/#comment-39096</link>
		<dc:creator>PakistaniMD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yursil.com/blog/?p=2134#comment-39096</guid>
		<description>Wow, that is unheard of! Does anyone think its little bit far-fetched? The Ottomans were against British both before and during WWI... right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that is unheard of! Does anyone think its little bit far-fetched? The Ottomans were against British both before and during WWI&#8230; right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

