More Manifestations of the Marginalization
Wing Leung describes a marginal person as “…one who does not belong. . . . [T]he marginal man…[dwells] at the margin of two cultures and two societies…[and possesses] a marginal mentality…[with its] unresolved identity crises.”
This marginalization of immigrants and specifically South Asians reflects itself in a few ways, some are internal and some external. One obvious and humorous representation of this duality is how the standard dress code at a South Asian Valima (post wedding party) is the very Western suit and tie, while traditional Shalwar Kameez is acceptable only at the wedding itself. This duality is a physical example of the same irrational self-hatred that many South Asians have of their culture and tradition.
The religious South Asians have inherited the Arabization complex, being proud in wearing their Keffiyeh and thobes. While the non-religious South Asians have inherited the Western complex, being proud in the overt sexualization of Bollywood movies and being satisfied with each and every encroaching Western footprint on their culture.
What is clear is that South Asians have been marginalizing their own historical legacy of Islamic spirituality and arts for some time.
The Wahabi/Salafi movement, and the creation of ideologies spawned from it, have only furthered the Arabization, forcing people to choose between Islam and their own culture. The number of anti-cultural movements such as that of Jamaat e Islami (and its offshoots) have all but eliminated the Qawalli, the beautiful Naat, the notoriously complex and enchanting poetry, and the tradition of sending Salaams to the Prophet (Salalalahu’alaiheewassalam) in unison after gathering. In the West these aspects of South Asian tradition are virtually non-existant.
Another manifestation of the marginalization is the rise of a circle of speakers which is distinctly non-Eastern. Today we see crowds of all-generation immigrant Muslims who are standing in line in the cold to listen to speakers who share their faith but not an ounce of their heritage and culture. This is absolutely monumental achievement in one sense, but it is also something that is not safe from all criticism. The one immediate question is: Why is nearly every speaker on Islam in the West a convert or a card carrying member of the Arabized Al-Madinah University ideology?
At a recent Islam in the West symposium held in New Jersey, while the key organizers were South Asian, there was really no hint towards their cultural influence in the art booths, in the music presented on stage, in the food being eaten, or in the clothes being sold. Islam in the West was largely empty of the multicultural ideal of the American promise in the first place. Islam in the West was, for the South Asian attendee, all about showing off how white or black we had become (while staying Muslim).
Other manifestations are extremely evident in second generation youth. They have to do with the humorous routes the youth take towards dealing with “Uncles”, making fun of speech, dress, and politics. South Asians have already dealt with the socially accepted profiling of their profession and accents by non-Muslims in shows like the Simpsons and numerous roles of cab drivers in films and TV. At the same time, South Asians youth have joined in the chorus, producing excellent clips such as an Al-Maghrib skit insulting the intelligence and religious knowledge of those with South Asian accents [link here]. The general idea of most Arabization movements, such as that which is coming from al-Maghrib Institute, is the empowerment of the youth and the targeted striking in the cracks between them and their past.
It is clear when the tradition of Sufism has in itself become marginalized that there is very little needed in terms of additional examples. This is the tradition of grounded Islamic spirituality which brought large numbers of South Asians into Islam in the first place, and it is largely unknown to today’s second-generation youth. In fact, it is now largely considered a reprehensible innovation by most American Muslims. There is no better example of self-hatred or ignorance of South Asian culture and faith than the fact that the children proclaim their fathers as the ultimate sinners: Mushriks.
South Asian Muslims are shockingly unaware of huge characters in their own history. Even amongst the circles of so-called “traditionalists,” one finds a reprehensible dearth of information about the South Asian contribution to the preservation of Islam. While one may understand that the Wahhabi project is fundamentally against the mere mention of the great Sufi saints of India, it is curious that institutions that I have deep respect for speak little of the history of Islam in South Asia. While such circles will literally go to China to find knowledge, as seen with the recent infatuation with Haji Nooruddin, they literally fly over India when talking about Muslim history. Thus, the rich tapestry woven by the Mughal Empire, as well as the deep roots sown by the Sufi saints, as well as the Ulema, in India, are totally forgotten. Indeed, this lack of mention seems to imply that South Asia has no contribution to Islam; a grave misconception.
Islam in India has been a dynamic force since it arrived into the Subcontinent. While Muhammad bin Qasim first brought Islam militarily, it was the Sufis who spread Islam in India. Richard Eaton, a leading scholar on conversion to Islam in South Asia, states in his book “The Rise of Islam and the Bengal Frontier,” that the traditional theories of Islam being spread by (a) the sword, (b) an egalitarian ideal, (c) social pressure, and (d) power center, are not viable. He states instead that Islam was spread by groups of Sufis who mixed with farming peasants who tended the land for their Mughal “zamindars.” (Link to book). These seeds led to the rise of some of the greatest scholarship seen in the history of Islam, as well as a deep spirituality.
One of the great saints of India who is never mentioned today, even amongst the traditionalists, is Sheykh Ali Hujweri (QaddasAllahu Sirruhu), who is buried in Lahore. Lovingly known as Data Ganjbaksh by South Asians, he wrote the first book in Sufism in Farsi, “Kashful Mahjub,” the Unveiling of the Hidden. Within this book, he addresses some of the most contentious issues of Sufism, including Fana and Baqaa. Within the book, he also argues for a deep orthodoxy to counter the rife Hinduism around him. Sheykh Ali Hujweri’s book was an immense contribution to the corpus of Sufi texts, and much of South Asia became Muslim at his hands.
Another spiritual sage, Khwaja Muinuddin Chishti (Q.S.), the founder of the Chishti Tariqat, was from India. Chishtiyya is one of the four major Tariqats of the world, with Qadiriyya, Naqshbandiyya, and Shadhiliyya. Upon his entrance to India, Khwaja Muinuddin stayed at the tomb of Sheykh Ali Hujweri for two weeks to seek permission to spread Islam to India. Before leaving the tomb, he proclaimed,
“Ganj Bakhsh-e faiz-e aalam, mazhar-e Nur-i Khuda
Naqisaan ra pir-e kaamil, kaamilaan ra rahnuma”
meaning
” Ganj Bakhsh is a manifestation of the Light of God for the people
A perfect guide unto the imperfect ones and a guide unto the perfect ones”
Khwaja Muinuddin spread Islam in the town of Ajmer and elsewhere, and he was known for his patronage of the poor. One of his greatest strengths was his ability to draw from the native Hindu culture and appeal to the non-believers in their own terms. Indeed, the Chishti Tariqa is noted for taking the musical forms of the Indian raga and Islamicizing it into Qawwali, in order to appeal to the native population.
And how can we speak of India without mentioning the Eminent Saint, Imam Rabbani, also known as Sheykh Ahmed Sirhindi. He was deeply involved in the politics of the region, and helped to free Islam of the innovations of false Sufism. Additionally, he wrote extensively on deep spiritual issues, such as the difference between Wahadat al-Wujud and Wahdat al-Shuhud. His work was to free Tasawwuf of the Biddat that it had become rife with. Additionally, he used his influence to help the Mughal Emperors to practice Islam correctly in the region. His work Maktubat is one of the most amazing texts of Fiqh, Shariat, Haqiqat, and Tasawwuf written in the history of Islam. Indeed, most scholars see him as the Mujaddid of his century.
When all this and more is missing from the culture of first generation Muslims, what are we expecting from the second generation? Whats clear is that South Asians have taken a turn towards the Arab, and are seeking to erase the past and join the ranks of Egypt, Syria, Morocco and others states who long ago embraced a continued Arabization. There seems to be a wealth of spiritual knowledge and artisitic accomplishment which has been, for far too long, locked up in the cage of the South Asian inferiority complex. While numerous efforts are underway in bringing various pieces of Arabic literature and tradition into the West, nothing is being done to represent this slowly forgotten segment of Islamic culture.
It is clear that American Islam, like the South Asian Muslim, is heading down a direct path of forced Arabization, and this is a tragic fate due to the irresponsibility and intellectual subordination of Muslim organizations, immigrant Muslims, and South Asian Muslims in general.
(continued with: Wahabi Arabic Hegemony and the Andalusian Ideal)
11 Comments
Trackbacks
- South Asian-Americans’ Self Hatred « Ali Eteraz
- the "arabization" of south asian muslims, and its detrimental effects - Forums - Islamica Community

Shaykh Ahmad Sirhindi’s name will live on, Imam Hujweri’s name will live on, and Khwaja Chishti’s name will live on. We don’t need to fear that “arabization” will extinguish their memory. Many Indo-Pak Muslims are indebted to these and many other saints who caused the conversion of their forefathers. Indeed, the “tribe” I belong to converted to Islam during the 12th century under the influence of the saint Baba Farid Ganjshakar. Thus, he will always have a special place in my heart.
Sallam Alykum:
awesome article on the group psychology of the Colonized Asians!
When a group of people are colonized, it de-spiritless-ize them. All these behavioral patterns and anthropological issues and search for new identity is an after effect……
Even Islam in America…from the beginning it has been popular in people who were slaves and when there is no more physical slavery in existence, the enslaved group still looks for extreme measures of affiliation…some in the form of Islamic cultural adoptions and some in the measures of animal-istic liberties, which is moral-less life style……
the asians were colonized….keep that in mind…they will now look for “reference” to place meaning into their empty lives….thats why there is so much conflict among muslims…clash of values!
Mulla Nafs-e-Zakiya!
This was an excellent series. I wrote something very similar, with less concrete examples a few months ago. I dont believe this is directly the fault of arabized muslims, I believe it is in the character of the people who immigrated from South Asia to America, which I believe consisted mainly of mawdudites.
according to some researchers, mawdudiya is a sect now with establish prophet hood-like qualities attributed to Mawdudi hazretleri. Did you also know that the name for mawdudiya in Americas is ICNA-Islamic Circle North America.
Dar ul ullom Deoband research faculty head Mevlana Saeed Palanpuri sheikhulhadees has 10 CD long detailed lectures about this Mawdudiya fitna and its toxic effects on spiritual muslims and how it weakened the khilafat movement in India.
I would not accuse ICNA of such things. I know that alot of them are jamat islami/mawdudites, but I would never call it a sect, or anything like that. It is sunni islam.
There is one mosque where I live that has loose ties to Jamaat-e-Islaami. I don’t find anything wrong with it, it has attracted more converts than any other mosques and the Imam there is quite a jolly fellow.
I agree there is nothing wrong w/Jamaat Islami, I have no issues w/them. I was suggesting that because of the influx of south asian immigrants who held Mawdudi in high esteem, this may be why we see less representation of traditional south asian scholarship here.
I am not sure if we will be able to speak openly about issues regarding Jamat ul Islamiya in here cause we all know that text based conversation can take a negative turn in less then a nano-second and causes rifts between, already divided ,ummah….
So do not think of this as an attack or even as a negative remark, but during research on the origins of Jamat Islamiya it was observed by neutral and casual researchers that their aqeeda in regards to “acts” of sahaba was not according to ahle sunnah and the greater understanding.( swad e azam). Their aqeeda in regards to sahabay ikraam as written out in great deal by Mawdudi hazretleri “smells” of rawafiddiya attitude. Keeping in mind that according to Ahle sunnah, prophets are “innocent” and sahaba are “protected”. Abdullah Ibn Masood and one other sahabi whose name escapes me, called sahaba and their acts as “mahfooz” from scrutiny and maltreatment.
so anyways, lets move on, I don’t want to get into any argument, try to ignore what I said…and make dua for me to fix my inside asap.
Two weeks ago a friend of mine 32 years of age was found dead in his car by cops on long island, only a week ago 29 years old friend went home from gym with me, he died in his sleep, and guess what Monday a co workers 21 years old daughter passed away in her house ….What is going on…dance of death all around…..? lets go back to our inner lives!
masha Allah awesome piece!! I hope that all the tradtional “thinktanks” do read this and I would suggest fwding this to all said organizations.
the only thing is i think the article implicitly defines south asian as indian/pakistani….yet on the section on how the sufis spread islam (eaton) it refers to bengal which seemed out of place to the argument as a whole….so speaking as a bengali that often gets left out of the whole Indo-pak discussions (and categorizations) usually i think there is a brushing over what exactly is “south asian” itself….i remember having a pakistani brother who is VERY prominent in the whole “traditional” scene tell me that bengalis aren’t considered desi…yet no region contributed more in terms of grass-roots tassawuf, and many of the awliya from yemen settled there….
as-salamu’alaikum Fareez,
Thank you for your comment. In fact, I apologize to you that I didn’t mention Bengali’s. I do consider them South Asian, and when I am speaking of India, I am speaking of the greater historical India which includes Kashmir, Pakistan, Bengal etc.
I wonder why and how then some traditionalist opt to marry Arab traditionalist sufis if in fact they feel they are being marginalized or arabinized in USA? Just wondering about that since I have seen that happne or is it because those Arabs have opted to adopt South Asian scholarship like the Deobandi tariqahs?