Comments on: Ahmadiyya and Muhummad Ali http://www.yursil.com/blog/2004/05/ahmadiyya-and-muhummad-ali/ islam, muslims, history, excerpts, life Sat, 31 Dec 2011 04:37:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Khalid http://www.yursil.com/blog/2004/05/ahmadiyya-and-muhummad-ali/#comment-43061 Khalid Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:15:10 +0000 http://www.yursil.com/wordpress/?p=38#comment-43061 Any one who considers the Lahoris Muslims is a Kafir himself. That is the majority opinion of the ulama. The ulama who dealt with the Qadiyanis and Lahori-Qadiyanis are the reference point on this matter not those who don't have a clue about the language (urdu) and other fine points of that part of the world. Any one who considers the Lahoris Muslims is a Kafir himself. That is the majority opinion of the ulama. The ulama who dealt with the Qadiyanis and Lahori-Qadiyanis are the reference point on this matter not those who don’t have a clue about the language (urdu) and other fine points of that part of the world.

]]> By: Andrew Hasin http://www.yursil.com/blog/2004/05/ahmadiyya-and-muhummad-ali/#comment-43003 Andrew Hasin Wed, 08 Sep 2010 23:48:57 +0000 http://www.yursil.com/wordpress/?p=38#comment-43003 Are you sure Sidi Hamza said the Lahoriyya sect are considered Muslim? I believe the most relied upon belief is that the Lahoriyya are also considered non-Muslim due to their denial of `Isa (as) being the Messiah (Masih) Are you sure Sidi Hamza said the Lahoriyya sect are considered Muslim? I believe the most relied upon belief is that the Lahoriyya are also considered non-Muslim due to their denial of `Isa (as) being the Messiah (Masih)

]]> By: Student of ILM http://www.yursil.com/blog/2004/05/ahmadiyya-and-muhummad-ali/#comment-31681 Student of ILM Mon, 05 Nov 2007 15:59:13 +0000 http://www.yursil.com/wordpress/?p=38#comment-31681 Visit my website, there are very nice articles about Ahmadiyya. Please leave comments. Visit my website, there are very nice articles about Ahmadiyya. Please leave comments.

]]> By: Hasan Bilal Khan http://www.yursil.com/blog/2004/05/ahmadiyya-and-muhummad-ali/#comment-25384 Hasan Bilal Khan Sat, 19 May 2007 02:57:54 +0000 http://www.yursil.com/wordpress/?p=38#comment-25384 THE LAHORIS ARE DEVIATED MUSLIMS THE QADIYANI GROUP ARE KAAFIR FOR THEIR DENIAL OF KHATM AN-NABUWWAT THE LAHORIS ARE DEVIATED MUSLIMS
THE QADIYANI GROUP ARE KAAFIR FOR THEIR DENIAL OF KHATM AN-NABUWWAT

]]> By: kaleem` http://www.yursil.com/blog/2004/05/ahmadiyya-and-muhummad-ali/#comment-9299 kaleem` Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:31:03 +0000 http://www.yursil.com/wordpress/?p=38#comment-9299 You should probably try reading some of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's works before judging him too, and understand what his claims were. You should probably try reading some of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad’s works before judging him too, and understand what his claims were.

]]> By: UZ http://www.yursil.com/blog/2004/05/ahmadiyya-and-muhummad-ali/#comment-537 UZ Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.yursil.com/wordpress/?p=38#comment-537 Salaam 'Alaikum Who or what Al Azhar recommends aside, Sh. Hamza (among others, but this is the one I remember by name and clearly) said that the Lahoris *are* considered Muslimeen, and it is the other group that are outside of our circle b/c of their beliefs about Ghulam Mirza. Salaam ‘Alaikum

Who or what Al Azhar recommends aside, Sh. Hamza (among others, but this is the one I remember by name and clearly) said that the Lahoris *are* considered Muslimeen, and it is the other group that are outside of our circle b/c of their beliefs about Ghulam Mirza.

]]>